Towards the odds of making out on target, there is a life threatening communications anywhere between grandiose narcissism and you can new member gender, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. This interaction are presented from inside the Fig 2. The simple mountains for men (simple hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may female (simple mountain = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t extreme. Grandiose narcissists don’t show a heightened odds of making out having an attached address more just a single one (? = .068, t = step 1.127, p = .261), indicating you to definitely grandiose narcissism wasn’t on the companion poaching having a primary-identity fling.
Grandiose narcissists tend to statement companion poaching -specifically for new quick-identity . not, a question stays on whether they pick members of relationship alot more worth getting than just people who find themselves unmarried. Widman and you may McNulty reason juego citas universitarias why grandiose narcissistic tendencies might possibly be triggered around the activities normally (such as the worry about-report from lifestyle incidence off intimate conclusion), yet not be activated when placed in a specific disease. Hence, it will be possible that grandiose narcissists divulge a reputation interesting in the mate poaching, but do not always pick those in dating getting best friends. We tested it chance when you look at the four studies.
Companion poaching collection.
For very long-label spouse poaching, grandiose narcissism was a significant predictor for women (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you can a marginally high predictor for men (? = .218, t = step 1.725, p = .088). Not one of one’s Huge Four parameters were high. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a significant predictor off victory from the poaching with the enough time-title for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nonetheless it was for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). Nothing of the other factors was indeed extreme apart from ladies’ neuroticism; when people had been so much more neurotic, it reported even more success from the poaching for some time-label intimate relationships.
Of interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t associated with the partner poaching certainly males. This result is consistent with abilities said by Kardum and you may acquaintances . Hence, it is possible one grandiose narcissistic ladies are more frequently responsible off spouse poaching.
Information and you may process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.